While in Chicago, I read the following article in the NY Times, in my Ipod touch.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/us/07bully.html?pagewanted=1&sq=tolerance%20public%20school&st=cse&scp=1
This article merged my old "secular humanist" world with my current "Christian" world. The article reminded me as to why I'm not a fan of the label "Christian," yet I can finally accept it, because I am a follower of Christ.
The article discusses how school districts are trying to promote acceptance of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered students and families while receiving backlash from heterosexual families concerned that students are hearing about such topics too explicitly or too soon.
Here is a haunting quote: “Anyone who reads this document can see that it promotes acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle,” one mother said at a six-hour school board meeting in late September.
I believe acceptance is precisely the point! Her quote seems to indicate that American culture has not yet fully accepted the homosexual lifestyle.
Here is when the term "Christian" begins to be thrown into the mix: “Of course we’re all against bullying,” Mr. DeMato, one of numerous pastors who opposed the plan, said in an interview. “But the Bible says very clearly that homosexuality is wrong, and Christians don’t want the schools to teach subjects that are repulsive to their values.”
As a Christian (and I hope I don't screw up the gospel in this post), my heart sank as I read the article. Who made Christians the ultimate judges of what to teach?
How dare someone challenge Christian values.
So, lets discuss Christian values. The Bible also says not to lie, steal, covet thy neighbor's goods (which seems to be the core of capitalism), etc. Clearly, we are all guilty of violating God's laws. The law is intended to show us our own need for a Savior. Enter Jesus Christ. He came to die for our sins. Who did Jesus spend much of his time with aside from the Apostles? The sick, the abandoned outcasts of society, prostitutes, tax-collectors: the people with whom the Pharisees (a self-righteous group who made up laws to follow to please God) refused to associate.
Therefore, as Christians, I'm fairly certain we should spend our time loving those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered.
This last quote moves me as an educator. But one of the objecting parents, Tammi Shulz, who describes herself as a traditional Christian, said, “I just don’t think it’s great to talk about homosexuality with 5-year-olds.”
It seems like a valid point, correct? How can one argue with such a point? Who wants to steal a piece of innocence from a child? This year is my third year as a speech language pathologist. This year, I work with a 4 year old who has two mothers. The little girl is adopted and will be given a plethora of opportunities that her (heterosexual) birth mother could not provide. The other day a kindergarten teacher told me how one of the female students I work with wants to be a boy. There is a first grade student who also has two mothers.
Like it or not, age 5 may not be too young after all.
Out of curiosity, does the term "traditional" Christian imply there is a "radical" or "liberal" Christian? Jesus and his teachings were radical. He calls us to do radical things, like love those who are poor and marginalized. He calls us to love people who make us feel uncomfortable. I fail at this all the time, which is why I praise Jesus for loving everyone. He loves the "traditional" Christians, the rich, the poor, the atheists; he loves you and me. Jesus knows who we are and loves us so much.
I truly would like some thoughts and feedback from my Christian friends. Part of the reason why I stopped believing in God was related to how "Christians" did not accept homosexual people. I'm new to the Christian world and I'd like to hear others' opinions.